by Tommaso Virgili
Is the new ruling just a capitulation
to extortionistic threats of violence?
One might also wonder where,
in the European Convention on Human Rights, "feelings" are mentioned.
Following the court's logic, would it be appropriate to cover the
windows of steakhouses not to hurt the feelings of animal activists? Or
only if they threatened to riot? Is the new ruling
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla
No comments:
Post a Comment